|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
URBANITY |
URBAN FABRIC TRANSIT | MYTHS |
Centuries of experience have told us that certain types of buildings work well in walkable communities by promoting the goals of density, mixed use and safety, and working together to form a continuous urban fabric. Although there are certain building types which diminish walkability, for example drive-through restaurants and monolithic office blocks, there are many examples of buildings which shouldn't work in walkable environments, but somehow do, such as the Pompidou Center in Paris, and the Guggenheim Museum in New York. The variety of building types compatible with a walkable environment is infinite, therefore I will not attempt to describe them all. My aim is to give examples of common building types which can be found in many walkable communities.
|
Row Houses: Known in the U.K. as terraced houses, these are houses of two to four stories which abutt buildings on either side. Row houses nearly always have a back yard, and usually a small front yard, porch or stoop. They are an incredibly efficient land use: the overall density of two-story row house neighborhoods often exceeds that of multi-story apartment complexes, where residents do not have back yards! |
|
Detached Houses: Detached houses are not a suburban phenomenon: they existed long before cars. Detached houses in walkable areas make efficient use of land by being oriented vertically rather than horizontally, and being placed at the front of the lot rather than the middle. |
|
Apartment buildings: The best designs have entrances and stairwells shared by a small number of residents, rather than long corridors, and have a variety of apartments from efficiencies to penthouses. |
Apartment Buidlings, such as this one in State College, PA, can be designed to fit in comfortably with residential neighborhoods. |
![]() |